 Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Ecstasy of Saint Teresa, 1652 -- The Ecstasy, oil on canvas, 120 x 90 cm, 2018
Without warning, the angel lunges with the arrow piercing it deep into her chest, releasing an excruciatingly sweet pain as Teresa’s head falls back with eyes closed in rapture. She opens her eyes momentarily, surprised to see bitcoin spill out from her as the arrow is withdrawn; however, Teresa is even more aware of the knowing smile appearing on the angel’s face and the intense heat radiating from her beating heart. The temporal being of St Teresa wishes this moment will never end but her spirit understands that there will be consequences. View the high res animation with audio at the SuperRare marketplace here. Demo video of the augmented reality feature below. The oil painting was created with this video July 2018 for my CryptoDisruption exhibition and the NFT was created March 2020 for the Cryptovoxels Virtual Reality 'Get Out While You Stay In' Art Experience. Saint Teresa of Ávila (1515 – 1582) described the scene in her autobiography, “In the angel’s hands I saw a great golden spear, and at the iron tip there appeared to be a point of fire. This he plunged into my heart several times ... and left me utterly consumed by the great love of God. The pain was so severe that it made me utter several moans. The sweetness caused by this intense pain is so extreme that one cannot possibly wish it to cease.”  Saint Teresa of Ávila by Peter Paul Rubens, 1615 Bernini used this masterful and undeniably erotic artwork as a springboard to a new and higher type of spiritual awakening. The work became a melding of sensual and spiritual pleasure, the heavenly and the earthly coming together. The piercing of Teresa’s heart becomes a point of contact between earth and heaven, between matter and spirit. These uniquely powerful combinations are what I focussed on when creating the original painting, the accompanying AR video and now with this NFT animation, which I'll be listing on the SuperRare marketplace. My painting was inspired by the 2017 crypto bull run and the euphoria that was sweeping across the world as bitcoin quickly surged towards $20,000. I searched for a powerful image that could be reinterpreted to convey the high emotion and insatiableness of the crypto companies, ICOs and over leveraged investors driving this delirium whilst heralding it under the guise of self-sovereignty, morality, and a Utopian prosperity. People’s lives were changing dramatically, literally overnight, ‘dreams’ were coming true, money was being made faster (and lost faster) than could be imagined. There seemed to be no limit to the heights and greed that could be achieved.  Cornaro Chapel, Rome In search for a symbol, I turned towards the highly ornate and extravagant Baroque period renowned for its ostentatious displays of wealth by the monarchs and decided on one of the greatest masterpieces of the 17th century, Bernini’s Ecstasy of Saint Teresa. This symbol would be reworked and reimagined with oil paint, video and animation in an attempt to convey the original message of connection with a ‘higher power’, the divine, but to also carry with it a message of caution and the need for responsibility. I aimed to capture that moment which Bernini first created – the moment when the angel and St Teresa act out a scene of both pleasure and pain simultaneously – but this time in front of a shining, golden bitcoin.
The Ecstasy, aka Bitcoin Angel, represents dreams, hope, good intentions and the desire to improve oneself, but it also acts as a warning to the greedy, self-absorbed and negligent that without caution and integrity, those ‘dreams’ can very quickly turn into something entirely different.
11 Comments
10 min read This is a story about how artists throughout history have learned from and have been guided by others as a result of creative partnerships and collaboration. Often, though not always, these relationships are born out of necessity. I'll begin with a brief intro to my NFT artwork 'Who is the Creator', which in the making of it is the reason why I became interested in artist collaborations. Below: A clip of Who is the Creator or view the high res NFT on SuperRare Picasso works in his studio, experimenting as usual. Today he’s painting a bull on glass while capturing the process on film. He doesn’t know why he decided to paint a bull; he simply felt compelled. As he lifts his brush, the artist is completely unaware of what’s taking place in the ethereal, invisible world around him. He doesn’t see the peer-to-peer transactions materialising on a new and innovative network that also happens to be encompassing his painting. Picasso is oblivious to the fact that these transactions have been accelerating recently and somehow are now guiding his hand as he creates his masterpiece.  ‘Who is the Creator?’ is a digital artwork conceived from my physical oil painting ‘Violin, Grapes and Bitcoin’, which in turn is a reinterpretation of Picasso’s analytical cubism masterpiece ‘Violin and Grapes’. I titled this digital piece with the notion of creative partnerships at the forefront of my thoughts. To underscore the significance of Picasso’s input I included in the digital work the clip of him so appropriately painting a bull while the upper layers of paint perpetually construct and fracture into cubism-like, geometric planes. Grapes metamorphose and multiply into coins that shower down to the ground and a rocket launches and vanishes into the atmosphere. As the painting animates, the grapes/coins and rocket along with the other crypto iconography embedded into it dislodge and activate. More subtle however, is the secondary video clip underneath; the visualisation of the Bitcoin network accrediting the OG and Creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.  Who is the Creator? - 3 gif stages However, the aim of this essay is not so much to discuss the painting but instead to explore in an historical context how creative collaboration as well as the ‘ad hoc’ hiring model employed by artists since the 16th century have been invaluable mechanisms to realise one’s artistic vision. I’ll also discuss how artists in the cryptoart space are benefiting from similar relationships and creative processes albeit updated versions while at the same time I’ll encourage the reader to question from where an artwork truly originates and how much of the end piece is in fact wholly of the artist. A Fruitful Relationship After the hugely successful launch of the EthGirl project with the brilliant @money_allota I was looking forward to working with him again on another piece. Unfortunately, Alotta has become the victim of his own success and he’s currently so backed up with other business that it could very well be years before he has the time for a TJones + Alotta reunion. I hope not!  Ethereum Girl Playing a Mandolin and EthGirl NFT I was disappointed at first but at the same time I saw this as an interesting opportunity. I began thinking about how (and why) artists throughout history have worked together as they adapted to challenges including creative stagnation, supply and demand, or requiring more specialised technical abilities to realise their vision. This in turn got me thinking about the ubiquitous dual-artist projects appearing in the crypto space right now and how many of these NFT artists are sharing skills, learning from each other and producing exciting works of art that never could have been created as solo projects. It really does seem to be a win/win for everyone involved including the collectors who are benefitting from an ever-expanding gallery of quality artwork to enjoy and invest in. In the Beginning  One could argue that cave paintings dating back tens of thousands of years are the first examples of artistic collaboration, but I’m not going to talk about these. I’m trying to write an interesting and succinct essay and not a PhD thesis! So instead, let’s begin with the Renaissance when the Western art world really began rocking it. By the early 1500’s the most skilled artists were running huge workshops taking on apprentices and hiring journeyman artists. The more experienced apprentices would perform various functions with the paintings such as filling in some of the background, painting drapery and possibly even adding in some of the people on larger compositions. Artists began as apprentices at a very young age and children working at ten years old and even younger was not uncommon. Shhh, child labour!! It was through years of workshop experience under the tutelage of the master that the youngsters were able to gain knowledge and skills and, if talented enough, were able to eventually become masters in their own right. Even Leonardo da Vinci was a journeyman, working with the famous Verrocchio. You can see in Verrocchio’s painting, Baptism of Christ (1472), a 20 year old Da Vinci added to part of the landscape and painted one of the angels. According to the Renaissance writer Vasari, Da Vinci’s angel was so impressive that the great Verrocchio decided on the spot to quit painting. I guess having the young protégé Da Vinci as your soon-to-be competition would be pretty soul destroying for anyone.  Da Vinci vs Verrocchio The workshop model was really ticking along; however, this all began to change by the late 16th century. Why, you ask? Well, in part, some of the masters were looking for a little more work/life balance, travel opportunities and more flexibility in their work environment – but a lot of it was down to ego. The master and apprentice workshop model began to decline as a stigma emerged with it being associated with the artisan tradespeople who, in public opinion, lacked any level of sophistication or education. The great painters, sculptors and architects saw themselves more as creative geniuses than as craftsmen and were looking to raise their status (and their wages) in society. Some things never change, hey? Therefore, they needed to distance themselves from the perception of ‘mere’ craftsmen with their factory-like artwork production. The exceptionally gifted master artists were able to achieve this elevated status in part by shutting down their workshops, becoming independent i.e. going solo and thereby having more flexibility for travel, better opportunities to network and the possibility to secure large commissions with wealthy patrons in different regions or countries. In a way, they became the first gig workers of the 16th century. Of course, they still needed help on the bigger projects and so they would hire assistants ad hoc when necessary. The More Things Change The More They Stay The Same Artist collaborations have played important roles in the creation of some of the world’s most recognisable works of art. A few examples of exceptional partnerships include Andy Warhol and Jean-Michel Basquiat, Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg, Marcel Duchamp and Man Ray, and Pablo Picasso and Gjon Mili. And then of course there are the artists whose entire careers have been built on collaboration such as Christo and Jeanne-Claude and Gilbert and George. So, what exactly are the benefits of partnerships and why do so many artists follow this creative route?  Andy Warhol and Jean-Michel Basquiat Why Collaboration Is The Way to Grow As An Artist
Now that I’ve established a few of the categories of artistic collaboration and the benefits I’d like to draw your attention to how the Renaissance workshop model reinvented itself in the last ½ century. Employing artists, in particular ones who were more skilled in other areas such as painting trees and foliage or drapery was not unusual throughout the Renaissance but by the mid-20th century the ‘genius artist’ studio/workshop model was being pumped full of steroids, taking on an entirely new and almost unrecognisable appearance. Andy Warhol was one of the masterminds behind this shift citing the Henry Ford production line ethos and the car maker’s success and market domination to help legitimise the artist’s screen printing mass production techniques. Skip ahead a few more decades and artists such as Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst have added rocket fuel and uranium to take Warhol’s studio concept to an even greater and more ostentatious level with Koons’ New York ‘factory’ having even been likened to an Apple plant. Both Koons and Hirst each, quite literally, have hundreds of artist employees and skilled professionals creating their art pieces, often entirely from start to finish. Hirst admitted he doesn’t even see many of the artworks being worked on in his studios until they’re completed and only at that point he decides if they ‘pass the grade’ to be exhibited.  Jeff Koons and some of his employee artists But Is It Art? Personally, I’m not a fan of this ‘artist as designer only’ trend and I feel that the more traditional Renaissance workshop model with the hand of the artist being an essential component in the creation of every artwork is important. David Hockney, one of my all-time favourites, is himself quite sceptical of this practice and in a not so subtle jab at Hirst, Hockney’s 2012 exhibition poster stated, “All the works here were made by the artist himself, personally.” Hockney explained in an interview, “I used to point out at art school, you can teach the craft, it’s the poetry you can’t teach. But now they try to teach the poetry and not the craft. It’s not difficult to argue that the studios of Warhol, Koons and Hirst are a natural progression from the Renaissance workshop model and, in fact, many of the most established artists of the past century have in some way shape or form experimented with working methods that weren’t 100% entirely ‘of their hand’. Picasso was another artist who benefited greatly from various types of (often lopsided) collaborative relationships. Don’t even mention Braque! In fact, although Picasso has been credited with making over 100,000 prints, 10,000 photographs and 3,500 ceramic pieces throughout his career, the bulk of the ‘grunt work’ was carried out by specialists, master printmakers and ceramicists etc. I guess to be fair, one can’t blame Picasso for this practice as it was also common knowledge that his use of technical professionals was driven by his eagerness to experiment, which he did even up until his final years. However, with this understanding, Picasso had more in common with the Renaissance masters than with the Hirst’s and Koon’s of the contemporary art world and regardless of how prolific Picasso was, his hand was always somehow directly connected to the work that is attributed to him.  Picasso ceramics No matter where one sits in this conversation around the question, “How much of the ‘hand of the artist’ is essential to actually make it their work of art?”, one can’t dispute the success of artists like Hirst and Koons. Both of these artists have taken the notion of ‘The Conceptual’ to the next level and have done exceptionally well because of this. My intention in writing this essay is not meant to criticise the working methods or tools used of other artists, it is only an attempt to be a (very tiny) historical breakdown of a few of the types of collaborative models and working relationships that have helped to produce some of the most famous artists and artwork in history. Of course, we all have our own opinions as to what we think makes a great work of art and the processes involved in its creation will inevitably play a role in how we feel about it. And finally, back to ‘Who is the Creator?’ When I discovered that I wouldn’t be able to work with Alotta on my second NFT I decided to take the ‘hired gun’ approach i.e. the Renaissance ad hoc specialist. I found a talented and experienced digital artist/animator who was able to help me realise my artistic vision and I have to say, the end result surpassed what I'd envisioned. ‘Who is the Creator’ is of course hugely influenced by Picasso but in other ways Satoshi Nakamoto made his own valuable contribution to the work. I also learned from Alotta through our EthGirl collaboration, which inevitable shaped some of my thought processes for this artwork. I think that this is one of the great benefits of collaboration: through interaction with other creatives we push our boundaries as we learn and, in the process, we discover new and exciting creative possibilities. We solve problems through partnerships and consequently develop an artistic vision of a physical (or digital) work of art that would never have materialised otherwise. Through all the different kinds of artist collaborations knowledge and experience are internalised, and new skill sets are carried forward in one’s future work. In all honesty, so many of my past tutors, mentors and even the influential artists that I’ve admired and studied over the years have all, in some way, played a part in the making of this piece. In Summary Who then really IS the creator of a work of art? Who is the Creator when two artists collaborate? Who is the Creator when an artist hires an ‘ad hoc’ specialist to develop the final piece or, as in Hirst’s case, hires people to produce the entire artwork from concept to completion? Who is the Creator when an artist uses an app to produce an artwork from one of their own original pieces or when an artist takes two or more stock images and inputs them into the same app to create something new? These last questions fascinate me. In my mind, there are definitely pros and cons to experimenting with and creating digital works with the likes of artbreeder, photomosh, and the assortments of glitch apps available. However, I think relying on apps such as these can very quickly lead one down a slippery slope as the work can turn into ‘all show and no go’ i.e. it looks super cool but there’s not really any substance or depth to it. Below are two of my experiments with Artbreeder, which is a website that lets you combine images using machine learning. I uploaded a Michelangelo figure in the left image and transformed it with the various setting options and in the right image I combined one of my own abstract paintings with an Artbreeder stock portrait image.
One could argue that these new and exciting digital tools are in fact comparable to the traditional collaborative partnerships between two artists or to the hiring of uniquely talented specialists. I’d contend that the quality of the new NFT artworks being produced will rest on how and why these digital tools are being used by the artist, which will subsequently determine how the finished work will be defined by others as exceptional or forgettable - i.e. art academics, critics and writers. Regardless, I’m certain that future art historians will do their best to unpack many of the NFT artworks being produced today as they write about the origins of the cryptoart scene. In conclusion, as far as I’m aware ‘Who’s the Creator’ is one of the first (possibly the first?) examples of an artist employing the Renaissance ‘ad hoc’ model to create an NFT artwork by hiring a trained specialist. I'm looking very forward to how this new art world develops in the coming months and years and how collaborations (with other artists and/or technology) will continue to add to and influence this new frontier. “You have to know the past to understand the present.” ~ Carl Sagan To end, here are a few examples of my favourite NFT artist collaborations to date. @hackatao and @oficinastk - Crazy Diamond [End-2019] @money_alotta and @jivdontexist – Saint Andreas @Coldie and @Xcopy - DystoPunk @oficinastk, @MattiaC and @ilan_katin - Islands and Strange Shores If you have any questions or would like to add your own favourite artist partnerships feel free to comment below.
Resources: Georges Braque, The Father Of Cubism; Subarna Ganguly Damien Hirst's work is an insult to craftsmen; The Telegraph The Evolution of the Artist's Studio; Ian Wallace Artists and the Workshop in 16th-century Florence; Louis Waldman The World of Leonardo: 1452-1519; Robert Wallace Why Collaboration Is The Way to Grow As An Artist; Shreya Dalela An artist asked on the SuperRare Telegram channel how to become a more successful artist in the digital art world and NFT (non fungible token) marketplace. Although I've only been creating artwork inspired by cryptocurrency since early 2018 and have been involved in this particular digital space for a very, very short while (see my previous blog post about my first NFT, EthGirl) I felt I could contribute to the conversation considering my art career began almost 20 years ago. I started listing all the things I've learned over the years and that I've focussed on to help me to eventually become a full time artist in 2014. I think many of the lessons I've learned about how to 'make it' in the traditional art world through reading and researching, trial and error and out right stubbornness are transferable to the NFT art world. It's not an exhaustive list and I'll probably edit and add to it at various points in the future. Have a look over it, take what you like, ignore the rest and feel free to leave any comments or some of your own suggestions below. How to become a successful, full time working artist |
| The original painting  | Still image from the animated GIF  |
Tweets about the sale of EthGirl:
WhaleShark: While I would love to continue to bid on the amazing work that @money_alotta and @trevorjonesart have created, the point that @Moderats and I want to make has been made. Cryptoart is the Future. My hat off to @Moderats, you've been here since the beginning, enjoy the reward :)
SuperRare: Final bid of 72.1 ETH ($10,027.50) from collector @Moderats was accepted this morning by artists @trevorjonesart & @money_alotta for the “EthGirl” ! A new sale record on SR and a huge milestone for #CryptoArt, congrats to all!
Jason Bailey (@artnome): Don't sleep on CryptoArt, it's regularly selling for hundreds to thousands on @SuperRare_co these days. The future is now!
WhaleShark: While I would love to continue to bid on the amazing work that @money_alotta and @trevorjonesart have created, the point that @Moderats and I want to make has been made. Cryptoart is the Future. My hat off to @Moderats, you've been here since the beginning, enjoy the reward :)
SuperRare: Final bid of 72.1 ETH ($10,027.50) from collector @Moderats was accepted this morning by artists @trevorjonesart & @money_alotta for the “EthGirl” ! A new sale record on SR and a huge milestone for #CryptoArt, congrats to all!
Jason Bailey (@artnome): Don't sleep on CryptoArt, it's regularly selling for hundreds to thousands on @SuperRare_co these days. The future is now!
Author
Musings about art and stuff
Archives
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
Categories
All
Art Scam
Art Tips
Bitcoin
Cryptoart
Frightened Rabbit
NFTs Digital Art
Steven Patrick
Synaesthesia
RSS Feed
